From: Exploring the effects of a family admissions program for adolescents with anorexia nervosa
Participant | Age | Family structure | Location | Complex presentation/Comorbidity | Participating family members in interview | Phone/Face-to-face interview |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 (female) | 12 | Intact | Rural | No | Parents, adolescent, all siblings | Phone |
2 (female) | 12 | Intact | Inner metropolitan area | No | Parents and adolescent (no siblings in family) | Face-to-face |
3 (male) | 13 | Intact | Outer metropolitan area | No | Parents, adolescent, all siblings | Phone |
4 (female) | 13 | Intact | Inner metropolitan area | Yes: self-harm | Parents, adolescent, all siblings | Face-to-face |
5 (female) | 14 | Non-intact | Inner metropolitan area | No | Parents, adolescent, all siblings | Face-to-face |
6 (female) | 14 | Intact | Rural | No | Mother, adolescent, one out of two siblings | Phone |
7 (female) | 15 | Intact | Interstate | Yes: self-harm; OCD | Parents, adolescent, all siblings | Phone |
8 (female) | 15 | Non-intact | Inner metropolitan area | Yes: self-harm; complex trauma | Parents, adolescent (siblings not present) | Face-to-face |
9 (female) | 16 | Intact | Outer metropolitan area | Yes: OCD | Mother, adolescent (siblings not present) | Face-to-face |
10 (female) | 16 | Non-intact | Inner metropolitan area | Yes: self-harm; complex trauma | Parents, adolescent, all siblings | Face-to-face |