Table 4 Correlation between actual figure, ideal figure, BDS and anthropometric indexes
From: Sport practice, physical structure, and body image among university students
BMI | Δ Arm Circumference | WHR | |
|---|---|---|---|
Females | |||
Actual Figure | 0.61 | −0.08 | −0.01 |
p = <.001 | p = 0.534 | p = 0.958 | |
Ideal Figure | 0.20 | 0.01 | 0.08 |
p = 0.132 | p = 0.930 | p = 0.537 | |
BDS | 0.49 | −0.01 | −0.07 |
p = <.001 | p = 0.465 | p = 0.589 | |
Males | |||
Actual Figure | 0.65 | −0.05 | 0.09 |
p = <.001 | p = 0.514 | p = 0.226 | |
Ideal Figure | 0.24 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
p = 0.002 | p = 0.731 | p = 0.873 | |
BDS | 0.58 | −0.07 | 0.01 |
p = <.001 | p = 0.329 | p = 0.203 | |