Skip to main content

Table 1 Participant, sample, design, outcome measures, QualSyst score and key findings for studies with longitudinal and prospective designs

From: Protective factors against disordered eating in family systems: a systematic review of research

Study

Country

Participant age (years)

Sample size

Participant gender

Participant ethnicity

Sample population

Design

Outcome measure

Qual Syst score

Protective factors identified

Ahren, Chiesa, Koupil, Magnusson, Dalman & Goodman (2013) [24]

Sweden

12 to 23

249894

Mixed (49% female)

Not described

Stockholm Youth Cohort

Prospective cohort study

Cases of ED

1.000

Having full siblings (for females only)

Allen, Gibson, McLean, Davis & Byrne (2014) [22]

Australia

M = 10.78

SD = 1.72

211

Mixed (54% female)

Not described

Childhood Growth and Development Cohort

Longitudinal design (2 years)

ChEDE, CARES (emotional eating)

1.000

Child satisfaction with family life

Berge, Maclehose, Loth, Eisenberg, Bucchianeri, Neumark-Sztainer (2013)* [23]

USA

M = 14.4

SD = 2.0

2348

Mixed (53% female) (Separate analyses)

18.9% White, 29.0% Black, 19.9% Asian, 16.9%Hispanic, 3.7% Native American, 11.6% mixed/other

School students in Project EAT (+parents)

Longitudinal study (2 years)

Dieting/unhealthy or extreme WCBs/binge eating in last year (Yes/No)

.900

Parent discussions around healthy eating.

NOT parent discussions about weight

Ferreiro, Seoana & Senra (2012) [34]

Spain

M = 10.84

SD = .78

942

Mixed (49% female) (Separate analyses)

98.5% White

School students

Longitudinal study (4 years)

ChEAT – Spanish Version

.900

Social support (feeling loved and supported by family) (boys only)

Haines, Gillman, Rifas-Shiman, Field & Austin (2009) ~ [31]

USA

M = 11.9

SD = 1.6

13448

Mixed (56% female) (Separate analyses)

93% White

Growing Up Today (GUTS) cohort

Longitudinal design (4 years)

Vomiting/use of laxatives/binge eating monthly, dieting weekly (Yes/No)

.900

Family meals

Haines, Kleinman, Rifas-Shiman, Field & Byrn Austin (2010) ~ [32]

USA

11 – 18

10540

Mixed (57% female) (Separate analyses)

Not described

Growing Up Today (GUTS) cohort

Longitudinal design (4 years)

Vomiting/use of laxatives/binge eating in past year. Overweight

.850

Family meals

Neumark-Sztainer, Eisenberg, Fulkerson, Story & Larson (2008)* [30]

USA

1/3 M = 12.8 ± 0.8,

2/3 M = 15.8 ± 0.8

2516

Mixed (55% Female) (Separate analyses)

48.5% White, 19.2% Asian, 19.0% African American, 5.8%

Hispanic, 3.5% Native American, 3.9% Mixed/Other

School students in Project EAT

Longitudinal design (5 years)

Chronic dieting/unhealthy or extreme WCBs/binge eating in the last year (Yes/No)

.950

Family meals

Neumark-Sztainer, Wall, Story & Sherwood, (2009)* [28]

USA

M = 12.7 ± 0.8

412

Mixed (56% female) (Separate analyses)

45% White, 24% African-American, 16% Hispanic, 6% Asian, 5% Native American, 4% mixed/other

School students in Project EAT identified as overweight

Longitudinal design (5 years)

Extreme WCBs/binge eating in the last year (Yes/No)

.950

Family meals.

Family connectedness

Neumark-Sztainer, Wall, Haines, Story, Sherwood & Van der Berg (2007)* [29]

USA

1/3 M = 12.8 ± 0.8,

2/3 M = 15.8 ± 0.8

2380

Mixed (55% female) (Separate analyses)

48.5% White, 19.2% Asian, 19.0% African American, 5.8%

Hispanic, 3.5% Native American, 3.9% Mixed/Other

School students in Project EAT

Longitudinal design (5 years)

Extreme WCBs, binge eating in the last year (Yes/No). Overweight.

.850

Family meals

Nicholls & Viner (2009) [25]

UK

30

11211

Mixed

Not described

1970 British Cohort Study

Prospective cohort study

Cases of AN

.950

High maternal BMI. NOT parenting style

  1. */#/~ = same participant sample