Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of the Hierarchical Regression Analysis Predicting BID-Change (n = 193)

From: Comparative effects of Facebook and conventional media on body image dissatisfaction

Model

Variable

B

SEB

β

R 2

R 2 change

P

1

Intercept

-.081

.162

    
 

Pre-thin-ideal internalisation

.015

.004

.296

  

.000**

 

Pre-self-esteem

-.030

.040

-.055

  

.451

     

.100

.100

 

2

Intercept

-.136

.178

    

Pre-thin-ideal internalisation

.007

.004

.136

  

.110

Pre-self-esteem

-.005

.041

-.010

  

.895

AC

.066

.020

.267

  

.001**

Exposure

.054

.041

.096

  

.182

    

.155

.055

 

3

Intercept

-.139

.178

    
 

Pre-thin-ideal internalisation

.007

.004

.136

  

.108

 

Pre-self-esteem

-.013

.043

-.023

  

.764

 

AC

.073

.024

.298

  

.002**

 

Exposure

.056

.041

.098

  

.172

 

AC*exposure

-.022

.035

-.057

  

.540

     

.157

.002

 
  1. Note. The dependent variable was BID-change; B = unstandardized regression coefficient; SEB = standard error of the coefficient; β = standardized coefficient; *p < .05, **p < .01