Skip to main content

Table 2 Risk of bias assessments

From: Meta analysis on the efficacy of pharmacotherapy versus placebo on anorexia nervosa

Study

Sequence generation

Allocation concealment

Blinding

Incomplete data

Selective outcome

Total risk of bias assessment

Attia, 1998 [17]

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

High

Attia, 2011 [18]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low

Bissada, 2008 [19]

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Unclear

Brambilla, 2007a [20]

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Unclear

Brambilla, 2007b [21]

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Di Vasta 2012 [22]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low

Fazeli 2010 [23]

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

Unclear

Grinspoon 1996a [24]

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

High

Grinspoon, 1996b [24]

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

High

Grinspoon, 2002a [25]

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Grinspoon, 2002b [25]

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Halmi 1986 [26]

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

Unclear

No

Unclear

Hill 2000 [27]

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Kafantaris 2011 [28]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low

Lacey 1980 [29]

No

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Miller 2011 [30]

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

No

Unclear

Misra 2011 [31]

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low

Strokosch 2006 [32]

Yes

Unclear

Yes

No

Yes

Unclear

Vandereycken 1984 [33]

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Unclear

Walsh 2006 [34]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low

  1. Note. yes (=the study reports correctly on this domain and there is no risk of bias); no (=the study reports on this domain but according to the description the domain could be biased); unclear (=the study does not provide sufficient information to make an assessment).