Skip to main content

Table 2 Means and SDs for all measures across time by treatment group (n = 26)

From: A preliminary study of motivational interviewing as a prelude to intensive treatment for an eating disorder

Measure and condition

Baseline

After pre-treatment

 

Mean

SD

Partial η2

Mean

SD

Partial η2

PCED – pros subscale

      

   MI group

8.96

18.19

.001

1.60

23.41

.01

   Control group

10.33

23.87

7.50

26.86

PCED – cons subscale

      

   MI group

36.79

9.76

.001

40.27

9.23

.10

   Control group

36.05

14.99

32.18

14.61

MTC importance of eating

      

   MI group

8.09

2.74

.01

8.64

2.16

.000

   Control group

7.60

2.23

8.60

1.80

MTC confidence eatinga

      

   MI group

6.09

2.12

.01

7.64

1.63

.04

   Control group

5.57

2.38

6.86

2.07

MTC readiness eating

      

   MI group

7.73

2.15

.16

8.73

2.15

.20

   Control group

5.80

2.37

6.77

1.94

MTC importance restriction

      

   MI group

8.18

2.27

.21

8.27

2.49

.04

   Control group

5.53

2.90

 

7.47

2.31

 

MTC confidence restriction

      

   MI group

6.05

2.49

.01

6.73

2.49

.01

   Control group

6.47

2.31

 

7.27

2.31

 

MTC readiness restriction

      

   MI group

6.80

1.79

.10

9.60

.89

.41

   Control group

5.71

1.70

 

6.14

2.79

 

MTC importance weight/shape

      

   MI group

9.00

1.00

.16

9.45

1.04

.14

   Control group

7.47

2.23

 

8.33

1.68

 

MTC confidence weight/shape

      

   MI group

6.73

1.95

.09

5.82

1.78

.04

   Control group

5.00

3.21

 

6.67

2.19

 

MTC readiness weight/shapeb

      

   MI group

6.80

1.64

.06

9.80

.45

.29

   Control group

5.71

2.63

 

7.29

2.69

 
  1. No analyses were significant at an α of 0.01.
  2. a(n = 25).
  3. b(n = 12).
Back to article page

Journal of Eating Disorders

ISSN: 2050-2974