Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Functional brain alterations in anorexia nervosa: a scoping review

Journal of Eating Disorders volume 4, Article number: 32 (2016) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Neuroimaging allows for the identification of brain abnormalities and alterations that are associated with anorexia nervosa (AN). We performed a scoping review to map out the extent and nature of recent research activity on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in individuals diagnosed with, or recovered from, AN (AN-REC).

Main text

A literature search of PubMed, Psychinfo and Embase was conducted using the search terms “anorexia nervosa” AND “functional magnetic resonance imaging.” We included fMRI studies that involved a comparison between individuals with AN or AN-REC and healthy controls published in English language between 2010 and 2015. A total of 49 papers were included, regardless of the experimental stimuli or paradigm.

Conclusions

Findings varied considerably across studies, reflecting methodological differences in study design, such as sample differences and experimental paradigms. Collectively, studies published during the past five years suggest altered activation in regions related to the fronto-striato and the limbic circuits, which are theorized to have an important role in the pathophysiology of AN.

Plain english summary

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a severe mental disorder, and is characterized by self-induced starvation and excessive weight loss. The cause of the disorder is not known, however, it is assumed that altered activation in different parts of the brain could contribute to the symptoms and behavior seen in AN. A range of studies have been performed, to investigate brain activation in patients with AN, however the findings are varying. This could possibly be explained by differences in study designs, such as experimental conditions and sample size. We have collected the studies between 2010 and 2015, to map the nature of these studies. Based on gaps in the literature, we have made suggestions for future studies which are important to address to increase our understanding of AN. Furthermore, we have summarized the main findings from these studies. Although these findings are varying, they indicate altered brain activation in regions related to the fronto-striato and the limbic circuits, which have previously been theorized to have an important role in AN.

Background

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a complex mental disorder with an unknown etiology. There is a growing body of evidence indicating that risk for AN is genetically linked and that underlying neural networks may sustain the illness [1], similar to many other psychiatric illnesses [2]. Neuroimaging technology allows for investigating alterations in neural networks of the brain, and how these underlying neurobiological processes might contribute to the symptoms and behaviors seen in AN. However, to date, it is not known which regions and networks of the brain are involved in the etiology and pathophysiology of this illness. This paucity in knowledge has stimulated a rapidly growing literature base. An increasing number of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have been published over the past few years geared toward the identification of brain regions and neural circuits potentially involved in AN. Neural responses to disorder-specific images related to body image or food, for example, have been investigated among patients with AN, and neural activation or alterations during the performance of such tasks has been documented in the literature [3, 4].

However, these studies often vary in terms of experimental paradigms and stimuli, posing challenges to the interpretation and synthesis of findings. Prior review papers have focused rather narrowly upon specific experimental stimuli or affected area, for example, the nature of limbic dysfunction in AN, with a specific focus on emotional and perceptual neural circuits [5]. Other reviews have focused on imaging studies investigating neural responses to food cues [3], processing of food, body and emotional stimuli [6], and body image distortion [4]. Friederich et al. [7] reviewed brain imaging literature related to the anxiety and pathological fear learning model of AN, as well as the impulsivity learning of binge eating in bulimia nervosa, while Wierenga et al. [8] focused on recent studies that showed altered sensitivity to reward and punishment in eating disorders. Frank & Kaye [9] reviewed literature which included fMRI studies as well as studies including neurotransmitter receptor function. Kaye et al. [10] also reviewed the neurobiology of AN, with a specific focus on fMRI studies related to appetite, reward and executive control. Owing to the focus on a specific topic of interest, however, prior reviews do not provide an exhaustive overview of the available fMRI research within the field of AN. Notably, a systematic review of functional neuroimaging of studies published between 1950–2009 provided a summary of the possible role of neurobiological factors in AN [11]. Since then, however, numerous fMRI studies on patients with AN have been published, and there is a need for an updated review that includes all experimental paradigms.

Given a rapidly developing and broad literature base, a scoping review may be a beneficial approach to provide an overview of the extent, range, and nature of research activity related to fMRI in AN. Scoping reviews have become an increasingly popular approach to mapping out the existing literature in terms of the volume, nature, and characteristics, especially when research questions are complex or heterogeneous [12, 13]. Scoping reviews tend to address broader topics in which many different study designs or experimental paradigms are applicable [12]. In contrast to a systematic review, which summarizes the best available research on a specific research question, a scoping review is a useful way to collect and organize important background information and develop an overall picture of the existing literature [14]. Because previous reviews on fMRI research in AN have typically focused on specific research questions or theoretical models, there is currently no up-to-date overview of research activity within this field. This would be beneficial in order to identify gaps in the literature and provide directions for both future research and systematic reviews. In the present study, we performed a scoping review of literature on fMRI research in AN published between 2010 and 2015.

Main text

Literature search

Relevant literature was identified via searches in PubMed, PsychInfo and Embase databases using the search terms “anorexia nervosa” AND “functional magnetic resonance imaging,” published between 2010 and 2015. In all, the main search resulted in 184 articles. A supplemental search was performed by manually-searching relevant journals and via Google Scholar. This supplemented our main search with five studies. After removal of duplicates, a total of 148 articles were assessed for eligibility. Studies were included if they were published between 2010–2015 in English language, used fMRI, and compared a healthy control group and a currently ill AN group, or a group of recovered individuals with AN (AN-REC) and a healthy control group. Additionally, only fMRI studies involving performance of tasks in the scanner were included, whereas connectivity and resting state studies were considered beyond the scope of the present review. Abstracts and titles were screened for relevance and eligibility, and 81 records were excluded. The full texts of the remaining 67 articles were examined in more detail. Eighteen studies were excluded for the following reasons: reviews (N = 11), non-English language (N = 2), or lack of control group (N = 5). In all, a total of 49 articles were included in the present study. Figure 1 illustrates a PRISMA flow chart of the search strategy (see Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow of the search strategy

Full size image

Study characteristics

The majority of studies included females only, with three exceptions [15–17]. Forty-four studies included an adult sample (age ≥18 years), whereas only six studies included an adolescent sample (age < 18 years). In the studies including ill patients, the mean body mass index (BMI) in all patient groups was <17.5. Seven studies included a patient group in which the mean BMI was ≤15. The majority of studies included patients diagnosed according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder- 4th edition (DSM-IV) [18] criteria for AN, except for one study that used the fifth edition (DSM-5) [19]. Two studies did not specify DSM version. Fourteen studies included AN-REC patients.

In terms of sample size, the vast majority of studies had a sample of less than 20 patients, with one study sample of less than 10 patients. The largest sample size of the available studies was N =31.

Experimental paradigms

Table 1 provides an overview of all studies, including experimental paradigms and main findings. The main findings represents significant differences between the experimental group (AN or AN-REC) and a healthy control group. A striking feature of the literature relates to the heterogeneity in experimental paradigms across studies. To provide an overview of these experimental paradigms, studies were organized according to the following ten categories: body and appearance (n = 10), neuropsychological functions (n = 9), food (n = 5), reward (n = 6), emotions (n = 5), taste (n = 5), pain (n = 3), social cognition (n = 3), compulsivity (n = 2), and self-identity (n = 1). These categories were chosen to illustrate the volume and focus of research activity over the past years, and to aid synthesis of findings within each domain of investigation. Where the paradigms overlapped across categories, studies were categorized according to the research purpose and main implications as stated by the respective authors. These topics are discussed below (in order of number of articles).

Table 1 Review of the literature on fMRI studies in AN (2010–2015)
Full size table

Body and appearance

Ten fMRI studies have investigated neural activation related to the visual processing of body and appearance, both one’s own and another individual’s body. Upon viewing images of their own bodies, one study found that individuals with AN showed reduced activation in areas related to the attention network, and the authors suggested that this could indicate body-related avoidance behavior [20]. Distorted oversized images of own bodies has been associated with increased activation in the inferior frontal gyrus and middle temporal gyrus [21], as well as increased amygdala and reduced prefrontal cortex activation [22]. Other studies have reported increased activity in the insula [23] and ventral striatum [24, 25] in response to thin bodies. Comparing oneself to idealized bodies was associated with an increased activity in the insula and premotor cortex in patients, accompanied by reduced activity in the rostral anterior cingulate cortex [26]. Negative words related to body image elicited increased amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex and inferior parietal lobe activation [27]. Finally, one study found reduced activation of the prefrontal cortex and fusiform gyrus to images of body checking behavior [28]. Body checking involves repetitive checking of body shape and weight, and is a common feature of AN [29]. The only study investigating appearance-related stimuli in AN-REC individuals was conducted by Li et al. [30], who found increased activation in the secondary visual processing regions and the dorsal visual stream during passive viewing of faces. No other studies of AN-REC were identified using paradigms related to body or appearance.

Neuropsychological tasks

Neuropsychological tasks are standardized measures of cognitive functioning across various domains, and nine fMRI studies have employed neuropsychological testing in AN samples. Performance on a central coherence task was associated with reduced activity in the precuneus and increased activation in the fusiform gyrus in one study [31] and reduced task-related activation in the fusiform gyrus and the middle occipital gyrus in another study [32]. Inhibitory processing was associated with reduced activity in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, middle frontal gyrus and posterior cingulate cortex [33], and activation patterns were found to be dependent on the type of stimuli used in the task [34]. Performance on a set-shifting task was linked to reduced activation in the prefrontal cortex and parahippocampal cortex [35] whereas implicit learning was linked to reduced activity in the thalamus [36]. One study of working memory found increased activation in the superior parietal lobule and inferior temporal gyrus [17] while another found no differences between patients and controls [37]. One study investigated AN-REC individuals during an inhibition task, and found reduced activation in the medial prefrontal cortex [38].

Food

Neural responses to food stimuli have been investigated in five studies with mixed paradigms and results. Passive viewing of food images elicited increased activation in the dorsal posterior cingulate cortex and the insula in one study [39], and increased amygdala activity accompanied by reduced activity of the posterior midcingulate cortex in another study [40]. The authors suggested that results could be related to a dysfunction of top-down processes of the dorsal stream of emotion processing, however the evidence is not conclusive. When viewing food and told to think about eating it, patients with AN showed reduced activation in the cerebellum and increased activation in the visual cortex, suggesting a possible cognitive bias towards food stimuli [41]. One study comparing response to food images in ill and recovered AN patients found increased activation in cerebellum and middle frontal gyrus and decreased activation in precuneus and superior frontal gyrus in AN, while AN-REC showed increased activation in the caudate, cerebellum, middle frontal gyrus and post central gyrus [42]. One study also found that AN-REC showed greater activation than healthy controls in the ventral anterior insula to anticipation of viewing images of food [43]. These studies on AN-REC show that differences in processing of food stimuli are present not only during the underweight phase of AN, but show different patterns than during the illness phase.

Reward system

Food restriction and the pursuit for thinness in AN has previously been linked to the reward system [44], and six studies have investigated the neural correlates of reward in AN. In a social reward paradigm, social acceptance was related to decreased activation in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, and social rejections were related to increased activation in the secondary visual cortex [45]. Studies using monetary reward found altered activity in cortico-striatal reward systems in response to unexpected rewards [46] and during a delay discounting task [47]. In an adolescent AN sample, patients showed an exaggerated striatal response to losses compared to wins, which could be related to sensitivity to punishment typically seen in this patient group [48]. In AN-REC, a monetary reward task was associated with increased activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [49], whereas a delay discounting task revealed increased activation in the middle frontal gyrus [47].

Taste

Five studies have investigated the neural activation to gustatory processing of food stimuli or taste with mixed results. Despite the role of the hypothalamus in food intake processes and energy homeostasis, one study found no differences in hypothalamus activity during glucose intake in AN [50]. Another study found increased amygdala activation in AN patients when feeling hungry, consistent with heightened fear or emotional response to taste stimuli [51]. Results have also been mixed for AN-REC with some studies finding no differences in taste processing [52] but some have shown reduced sucrose sensitization [53] and reduced insula response to sucrose taste in this group [54].

Emotions

Five studies employed emotional paradigms involving affective facial stimuli or words. Negative words concerning interpersonal relationships were associated with increased activation in the superior temporal gyrus in AN [55]. Patients with AN also showed increased activation in the fusiform gyrus in an implicit facial expression task [32] and increased activity in right inferior and middle temporal gyri and right lingual gurys in response to own face stimuli [56]. In AN-REC, an emotional conflict task resulted in less activation in the bilateral amygdala, hippocampus and basal ganglia [57] while another study found no significant differences between AN-REC and healthy controls during viewing of fearful and happy faces [58].

Pain

Reduced perception of pain is a well-established phenomenon in AN [59], and three studies have investigated the neural correlates of pain in AN using thermal heat stimuli. AN patients showed reduced activity in the insula, cerebellum and pons [15] in addition to increased activation in the posterior, dorsal and medial cingulate cortex [16]. In AN-REC, anticipation of pain was associated with increased activation in the anterior insula, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and cingulate, while receiving painful stimulation was associated with greater activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and reduced activation in posterior insula [60].

Social cognition

Three studies have investigated aspects of social cognition. Two of these have focused on theory of mind, defined as the metacognitive ability to understand mental states of other people, such as beliefs, wishes and desires. Both currently ill [61] and recovered AN patients [62] showed reduced activation during a theory of mind task in areas in the temporal cortex and medial prefrontal cortex. In a trust game targeting social relationships, both ill AN patients and AN-REC showed reduced activation in the precuneus and angular gyrus in response to benevolence (improved relationships) [63]. Only the ill AN group showed differences in the fusiform gyrus in response to malevolence (deteriorating relationships).

Compulsivity

Two studies have used paradigms targeting compulsivity. Clinical features of AN comprise restricted eating, a compulsive pursuit of thinness, compulsive exercising and a relentless perfectionism [64]. During a cue-reactivity paradigm measuring compulsivity, patients with AN had increased activation in the caudate and precuneus [65]. Another study found that images provoking concern for symmetry and exactness and was associated with reduced activation in the superior frontal gyrus and the precuneus in AN patients [66].

Self-identity

One study has investigated self-identity, using an identity appraisal task [67]. In AN-REC, reduced activity in the precuneus, dorsal anterior cingulate and middle frontal gyrus was seen during this task.

Conclusions

In the present study, we performed a scoping review of literature on fMRI in AN published between 2010 and 2015. We aimed to provide an update and overview of recent research activity related to fMRI studies in AN, regardless of experimental paradigm, to offer a comprehensive overview of this rapidly developing area of study. Given the diversity in experimental stimuli and paradigms applied, a scoping review offers a unique and beneficial contribution to our knowledge of research on fMRI approaches in this patient population. A total of 49 studies were included in the present review, which were categorized according to type of paradigm utilized. Specifically, these paradigms involved body-related stimuli (own and others), neuropsychological tests, food related stimuli, reward, emotions, taste, pain stimulation, social cognition, compulsivity, and self-identity. However, within each category there was a wide range of paradigms used, rendering an overall synthesis and direct comparison across studies complicated. It is worth noting that disorder-specific categories were overrepresented. Future research using non-disorder specific experimental paradigms would be beneficial to separate neural alterations associated with symptom provocation compared with general cognitive or emotional processing.

Collectively, main findings from these studies indicate altered neural activity across the brain, including the frontal, parietal, temporal and occipital lobes, as well as subcortical structures such as the amygdala, striatum, thalamus and the cerebellum. It is likely that alterations in multiple parts of the brain may jointly contribute to the array of symptoms and behaviors associated with the illness. It has previously been theorized that altered activation in regions related to the fronto-striato and limbic circuits have an important role in the pathophysiology of AN [44, 68–71]. Reduced activation in bottom-up regions such as the striatum, amygdala, hippocampus and cerebellum is often accompanied by increased activation in top-down regions such as the prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, medial prefrontal cortex and the anterior cingulate cortex [72]. Similarly, Kaye et al. [44] have suggested that limbic information processing is strongly inhibited by inputs from cognitive domains such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the parietal cortex, suggesting that this dysregulation of neural activation could explain restrictive eating seen in AN. Although results from fMRI studies vary, recent findings are interesting in light of theories suggesting these neurocircuit dysfunctions in AN. Future studies would benefit from using well-established paradigms targeting these implicated neurocircuits (e.g. presentation of food images, taste stimulus, executive function tasks, decision making tasks, and reward tasks) to allow for direct comparison and evaluation of activation patterns between AN patients, AN-REC and individuals from other populations.

There are several noteworthy gaps and methodological considerations of the existing literature which we have identified. First, the vast majority of studies included less than 20 participants per condition. As argued by Mumford [73], power analyses are uncommon in fMRI studies, but conducting a power analysis can reduce the likelihood of underpowered fMRI studies, as well as the chances for type II errors. In addition, there are numerous confounds and pitfalls which characterize research in fMRI, ranging from data acquisition, data analysis and interpretation of results (for further details, see [74]). We identified only three studies which included males suffering from AN, thereby restricting the generalizability of findings to females alone.

Only six of the fifty studies in this review included an adolescent sample. Yet, importantly, neurobiological factors that are related to the etiology of the disorder may differ from neurobiological factors which sustain the disorder. Further research on adolescent samples is warranted to identify neurobiological factors involved in the onset and development of AN, as younger individuals with a shorter duration of illness might be distinguishable in fMRI results from older individuals with a chronic or protracted illness. Future systematic reviews could also be beneficial to investigate whether there are any distinctions between the findings from research on adult and adolescent samples.

The scope of our review entailed studies of currently ill, underweight patients, and collectively, this body of research cannot speak directly to whether brain alterations are trait- or state effects owing to the effects of malnutrition or starvation. Investigations of weight-recovered individuals offer a complementary line of research, and partly address the potential confounding effect of severe underweight. Findings from these studies demonstrate that neural processes are altered even in individuals that have recovered from AN. However, scarring effects in the brain may persist due to the chronic effects of malnutrition and underweight. Follow-up studies with long-term recovered individuals with AN might reduce the impact of scarring effects. Further exploration of neural processing associated with disorder specific (e.g. food or body stimuli) versus non-specific (e.g. neuropsychological tasks) in AN-REC individuals would be an interesting topic for future research. At the time of the current review, no studies have investigated the neural activity associated with viewing images of bodies of different size and weight in AN-REC. This could provide insight into how these processes are affected during recovery, and whether sensitivity towards specific body shapes persists over time. In our review, we found only four studies which classified subgroups of AN patients according to AN-restricting type and AN-binge/purge type, which may risk overlooking important distinctions along behavioral lines. With one exception, these studies applied DSM-IV [18] diagnostic criteria, and future research is warranted to replicate and extend findings to samples defined by DSM-5 [19]. Future studies are also recommended to investigate whether neural alterations commonly seen in AN are specific to AN, or whether these findings could be related to common underlying, or transdiagnostic, neurobiological processes seen in other mental disorders, such as anxiety disorders and depression. FMRI studies including individuals with AN as well as another psychiatric comparison group can shed light on the specificity of neural alterations. This could also help shed light on whether the alterations found in AN samples reflect actual dysfunctions relevant for clinical features. Clinically speaking, findings from neuroimaging studies have the potential to enrich our understanding of brain alterations in AN, and may lead to the development of theoretical models for AN.

A scoping review is beneficial for broadly mapping a field of research, and to identify gaps in research and practice. Yet, and as opposed to a systematic review, however, no formal assessment of the methodological quality of the included studies is typically performed [75]. The present review offers an updated picture of research activity on fMRI and AN, focusing on studies published during the past 5 years. Utilizing a scoping review methodology, we have identified gaps in the literature which are important to address to advance our understanding of AN, and characterized the range and diversity of experimental paradigms applied in fMRI studies for AN. This review also provides a summary of main findings, which collectively indicate altered activation in regions related to the fronto-striato and the limbic circuits.

Abbreviations

AN:

Anorexia nervosa

BMI:

Body mass index

DSM-5:

Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fifth Edition

DSM-IV:

Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th Edition

fMRI:

functional magnetic resonance imaging

I-FEPT:

Implicit facial expression processing task

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

References

  1. Zipfel S, Giel KE, Bulik CM, Hay P, Schmidt U. Anorexia nervosa: aetiology, assessment, and treatment. Lancet Psychiatr. 2015;2(12):1099–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kendler KS. Twin studies of psychiatric illness: an update. Arch Gen Psychiatr. 2001;58(11):1005–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Garcia-Garcia I, Narberhaus A, Marques-Iturria I, Garolera M, Radoi A, Segura B, Pueyo R, Ariza M, Jurado MA. Neural responses to visual food cues: insights from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Eat Disord. 2013;21(2):89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaudio S, Quattrocchi CC. Neural basis of a multidimensional model of body image distortion in anorexia nervosa. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36(8):1839–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lipsman N, Woodside DB, Lozano AM. Neurocircuitry of limbic dysfunction in anorexia nervosa. Cortex. 2015;62:109–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu Y, Hu X, Wang J, Chen J, Guo Q, Li C, Enck P. Processing of food, body and emotional stimuli in anorexia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2012;20(6):439–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Friederich HC, Wu M, Simon JJ, Herzog W. Neurocircuit function in eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 2013;46(5):425–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wierenga CE, Ely A, Bischoff-Grethe A, Bailer UF, Simmons AN, Kaye WH. Are Extremes of Consumption in Eating Disorders Related to an Altered Balance between Reward and Inhibition? Front Behav Neurosci. 2014;8:410.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Frank GK, Kaye WH. Current status of functional imaging in eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 2012;45(6):723–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaye WH, Wierenga CE, Bailer UF, Simmons AN, Bischoff-Grethe A. Nothing tastes as good as skinny feels: the neurobiology of anorexia nervosa. Trends Neurosci. 2013;36(2):110–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pietrini F, Castellini G, Ricca V, Polito C, Pupi A, Faravelli C. Functional neuroimaging in anorexia nervosa: a clinical approach. Eur Psychiatr. 2011;26(3):176–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;19–32.

  13. Pham MT, Rajic A, Greig JD, Sargeant JM, Papadopoulos A, McEwen SA. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods. 2014;5(4):371–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Armstrong R, Hall BJ, Doyle J, Waters E. Cochrane Update. 'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review. J Public Health (Oxford, England). 2011;33(1):147–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bar KJ, Berger S, Schwier C, Wutzler U, Beissner F. Insular dysfunction and descending pain inhibition in anorexia nervosa. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2013;127(4):269–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bar KJ, de la Cruz F, Berger S, Schultz CC, Wagner G. Structural and functional differences in the cingulate cortex relate to disease severity in anorexia nervosa. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2015;40(4):269–79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Castro-Fornieles J, Caldu X, Andres-Perpina S, Lazaro L, Bargallo N, Falcon C, Plana MT, Junque C. A cross-sectional and follow-up functional MRI study with a working memory task in adolescent anorexia nervosa. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48(14):4111–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.

  19. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.

  20. Vocks S, Busch M, Gronemeyer D, Schulte D, Herpertz S, Suchan B. Neural correlates of viewing photographs of one's own body and another woman's body in anorexia and bulimia nervosa: an fMRI study. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2010;35(3):163–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Castellini G, Polito C, Bolognesi E, D'Argenio A, Ginestroni A, Mascalchi M, Pellicano G, Mazzoni LN, Rotella F, Faravelli C, et al. Looking at my body. Similarities and differences between anorexia nervosa patients and controls in body image visual processing. Eur Psychiatr. 2013;28(7):427–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Miyake Y, Okamoto Y, Onoda K, Kurosaki M, Shirao N, Okamoto Y, Yamawaki S. Brain activation during the perception of distorted body images in eating disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2010;181(3):183–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mohr HM, Zimmermann J, Roder C, Lenz C, Overbeck G, Grabhorn R. Separating two components of body image in anorexia nervosa using fMRI. Psychol Med. 2010;40(9):1519–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fladung AK, Gron G, Grammer K, Herrnberger B, Schilly E, Grasteit S, Wolf RC, Walter H, von Wietersheim J. A neural signature of anorexia nervosa in the ventral striatal reward system. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167(2):206–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fladung AK, Schulze UM, Scholl F, Bauer K, Gron G. Role of the ventral striatum in developing anorexia nervosa. Translat Psychiatry. 2013;3, e315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Friederich HC, Brooks S, Uher R, Campbell IC, Giampietro V, Brammer M, Williams SC, Herzog W, Treasure J. Neural correlates of body dissatisfaction in anorexia nervosa. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48(10):2878–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Miyake Y, Okamoto Y, Onoda K, Shirao N, Okamoto Y, Otagaki Y, Yamawaki S. Neural processing of negative word stimuli concerning body image in patients with eating disorders: an fMRI study. NeuroImage. 2010;50(3):1333–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Suda M, Brooks SJ, Giampietro V, Friederich HC, Uher R, Brammer MJ, Williams SC, Campbell IC, Treasure J. Functional neuroanatomy of body checking in people with anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord. 2013;46(7):653–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shafran R, Fairburn CG, Robinson P, Lask B. Body checking and its avoidance in eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 2004;35(1):93–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Li W, Lai TM, Bohon C, Loo SK, McCurdy D, Strober M, Bookheimer S, Feusner J. Anorexia nervosa and body dysmorphic disorder are associated with abnormalities in processing visual information. Psychol Med. 2015;45(10):1–12.

  31. Fonville L, Lao-Kaim NP, Giampietro V, Van den Eynde F, Davies H, Lounes N, Andrew C, Dalton J, Simmons A, Williams SC, et al. Evaluation of enhanced attention to local detail in anorexia nervosa using the embedded figures test; an FMRI study. PloS one. 2013;8(5), e63964.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Fonville L, Giampietro V, Surguladze S, Williams S, Tchanturia K. Increased BOLD signal in the fusiform gyrus during implicit emotion processing in anorexia nervosa. NeuroImage Clinical. 2014;4:266–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wierenga C, Bischoff-Grethe A, Melrose AJ, Grenesko-Stevens E, Irvine Z, Wagner A, Simmons A, Matthews S, Yau WY, Fennema-Notestine C, et al. Altered BOLD response during inhibitory and error processing in adolescents with anorexia nervosa. PloS one. 2014;9(3), e92017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kullmann S, Giel KE, Hu X, Bischoff SC, Teufel M, Thiel A, Zipfel S, Preissl H. Impaired inhibitory control in anorexia nervosa elicited by physical activity stimuli. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014;9(7):917–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sato Y, Saito N, Utsumi A, Aizawa E, Shoji T, Izumiyama M, Mushiake H, Hongo M, Fukudo S. Neural basis of impaired cognitive flexibility in patients with anorexia nervosa. PloS one. 2013;8(5), e61108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Firk C, Mainz V, Schulte-Ruether M, Fink G, Herpertz-Dahlmann B, Konrad K. Implicit sequence learning in juvenile anorexia nervosa: neural mechanisms and the impact of starvation. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015;56(11):1168–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lao-Kaim NP, Giampietro VP, Williams SC, Simmons A, Tchanturia K. Functional MRI investigation of verbal working memory in adults with anorexia nervosa. Eur Psychiatr. 2014;29(4):211–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Oberndorfer TA, Kaye WH, Simmons AN, Strigo IA, Matthews SC. Demand-specific alteration of medial prefrontal cortex response during an inhibition task in recovered anorexic women. Int J Eat Disord. 2011;44(1):1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gizewski ER, Rosenberger C, de Greiff A, Moll A, Senf W, Wanke I, Forsting M, Herpertz S. Influence of satiety and subjective valence rating on cerebral activation patterns in response to visual stimulation with high-calorie stimuli among restrictive anorectic and control women. Neuropsychobiology. 2010;62(3):182–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Joos AA, Saum B, van Elst LT, Perlov E, Glauche V, Hartmann A, Freyer T, Tuscher O, Zeeck A. Amygdala hyperreactivity in restrictive anorexia nervosa. Psychiatry Res. 2011;191(3):189–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Brooks SJ, O'Daly O, Uher R, Friederich HC, Giampietro V, Brammer M, Williams SC, Schioth HB, Treasure J, Campbell IC. Thinking about eating food activates visual cortex with reduced bilateral cerebellar activation in females with anorexia nervosa: an fMRI study. PloS one. 2012;7(3), e34000.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Sanders N, Smeets PA, van Elburg AA, Danner UN, van Meer F, Hoek HW, Adan RA. Altered food-cue processing in chronically ill and recovered women with anorexia nervosa. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015;9:46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Oberndorfer T, Simmons A, McCurdy D, Strigo I, Matthews S, Yang T, Irvine Z, Kaye W. Greater anterior insula activation during anticipation of food images in women recovered from anorexia nervosa versus controls. Psychiatry Res. 2013;214(2):132–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kaye WH, Fudge JL, Paulus M. New insights into symptoms and neurocircuit function of anorexia nervosa. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(8):573–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Via E, Soriano-Mas C, Sanchez I, Forcano L, Harrison BJ, Davey CG, Pujol J, Martinez-Zalacain I, Menchon JM, Fernandez-Aranda F, et al. Abnormal Social Reward Responses in Anorexia Nervosa: An fMRI Study. PloS One. 2015;10(7), e0133539.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Frank GK, Reynolds JR, Shott ME, Jappe L, Yang TT, Tregellas JR, O'Reilly RC. Anorexia nervosa and obesity are associated with opposite brain reward response. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37(9):2031–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Decker JH, Figner B, Steinglass JE. On Weight and Waiting: Delay Discounting in Anorexia Nervosa Pretreatment and Posttreatment. Biological psychiatry. 2015;78(9):606–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bischoff-Grethe A, McCurdy D, Grenesko-Stevens E, Irvine LE, Wagner A, Yau WY, Fennema-Notestine C, Wierenga CE, Fudge JL, Delgado MR, et al. Altered brain response to reward and punishment in adolescents with Anorexia nervosa. Psychiatry Res. 2013;214(3):331–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ehrlich S, Geisler D, Ritschel F, King JA, Seidel M, Boehm I, Breier M, Clas S, Weiss J, Marxen M, et al. Elevated cognitive control over reward processing in recovered female patients with anorexia nervosa. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2015;40(5):307–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. van Opstal AM, Westerink AM, Teeuwisse WM, van der Geest MA, van Furth EF, van der Grond J. Hypothalamic BOLD response to glucose intake and hypothalamic volume are similar in anorexia nervosa and healthy control subjects. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:159.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Vocks S, Herpertz S, Rosenberger C, Senf W, Gizewski ER. Effects of gustatory stimulation on brain activity during hunger and satiety in females with restricting-type anorexia nervosa: an fMRI study. J Psychiatr Res. 2011;45(3):395–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Radeloff D, Willmann K, Otto L, Lindner M, Putnam K, Leeuwen SV, Kaye WH, Poustka F, Wagner A. High-fat taste challenge reveals altered striatal response in women recovered from bulimia nervosa: A pilot study. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2014;15(4):307–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wagner A, Simmons AN, Oberndorfer TA, Frank GK, McCurdy-McKinnon D, Fudge JL, Yang TT, Paulus MP, Kaye WH. Altered sensitization patterns to sweet food stimuli in patients recovered from anorexia and bulimia nervosa. Psychiatry Res. 2015;234(3):305–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Oberndorfer TA, Frank GK, Simmons AN, Wagner A, McCurdy D, Fudge JL, Yang TT, Paulus MP, Kaye WH. Altered insula response to sweet taste processing after recovery from anorexia and bulimia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170(10):1143–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Miyake Y, Okamoto Y, Onoda K, Shirao N, Okamoto Y, Yamawaki S. Brain activation during the perception of stressful word stimuli concerning interpersonal relationships in anorexia nervosa patients with high degrees of alexithymia in an fMRI paradigm. Psychiatry Res. 2012;201(2):113–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Phillipou A, Abel LA, Castle DJ, Hughes ME, Gurvich C, Nibbs RG, Rossell SL. Self perception and facial emotion perception of others in anorexia nervosa. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1181.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Bang L, Ro O, Endestad T. Amygdala alterations during an emotional conflict task in women recovered from anorexia nervosa. Psychiatry Res. 2016;248:126–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Cowdrey FA, Harmer CJ, Park RJ, McCabe C. Neural responses to emotional faces in women recovered from anorexia nervosa. Psychiatry Res. 2012;201(3):190–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. de Zwaan M, Biener D, Bach M, Wiesnagrotzki S, Stacher G. Pain sensitivity, alexithymia, and depression in patients with eating disorders: are they related? J Psychosom Res. 1996;41(1):65–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Strigo IA, Matthews SC, Simmons AN, Oberndorfer T, Klabunde M, Reinhardt LE, Kaye WH. Altered insula activation during pain anticipation in individuals recovered from anorexia nervosa: evidence of interoceptive dysregulation. Int J Eat Disord. 2013;46(1):23–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Schulte-Ruther M, Mainz V, Fink GR, Herpertz-Dahlmann B, Konrad K. Theory of mind and the brain in anorexia nervosa: relation to treatment outcome. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012;51(8):832–841.e811.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. McAdams CJ, Krawczyk DC. Impaired neural processing of social attribution in anorexia nervosa. Psychiatry Res. 2011;194(1):54–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. McAdams CJ, Lohrenz T, Montague PR. Neural responses to kindness and malevolence differ in illness and recovery in women with anorexia nervosa. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015;36(12):5207–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Bulik CM, Tozzi F, Anderson C, Mazzeo SE, Aggen S, Sullivan PF. The relation between eating disorders and components of perfectionism. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160(2):366–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Rothemund Y, Buchwald C, Georgiewa P, Bohner G, Bauknecht HC, Ballmaier M, Klapp BF, Klingebiel R. Compulsivity predicts fronto striatal activation in severely anorectic individuals. Neuroscience. 2011;197:242–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Suda M, Brooks SJ, Giampietro V, Uher R, Mataix-Cols D, Brammer MJ, Williams SC, Treasure J, Campbell IC. Provocation of symmetry/ordering symptoms in Anorexia nervosa: a functional neuroimaging study. PloS one. 2014;9(5), e97998.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. McAdams CJ, Krawczyk DC. Who am I? How do I look? Neural differences in self-identity in anorexia nervosa. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014;9(1):12–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Uher R, Murphy T, Brammer MJ, Dalgleish T, Phillips ML, Ng VW, Andrew CM, Williams SC, Campbell IC, Treasure J. Medial prefrontal cortex activity associated with symptom provocation in eating disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161(7):1238–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Wagner A, Aizenstein H, Mazurkewicz L, Fudge J, Frank GK, Putnam K, Bailer UF, Fischer L, Kaye WH. Altered insula response to taste stimuli in individuals recovered from restricting-type anorexia nervosa. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33(3):513–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Wagner A, Aizenstein H, Venkatraman VK, Fudge J, May JC, Mazurkewicz L, Frank GK, Bailer UF, Fischer L, Nguyen V, et al. Altered reward processing in women recovered from anorexia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164(12):1842–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Zastrow A, Kaiser S, Stippich C, Walther S, Herzog W, Tchanturia K, Belger A, Weisbrod M, Treasure J, Friederich HC. Neural correlates of impaired cognitive-behavioral flexibility in anorexia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166(5):608–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Brooks SJ, Rask-Andersen M, Benedict C, Schioth HB. A debate on current eating disorder diagnoses in light of neurobiological findings: is it time for a spectrum model? BMC psychiatry. 2012;12:76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Mumford JA. A power calculation guide for fMRI studies. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012;7(6):738–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Haller S, Bartsch AJ. Pitfalls in FMRI. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(11):2689–706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):141–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was funded by Health South-East, Norway.

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

TSF, NIL, DLR and ØR contributed to the concept and design of the study. TSF performed the literature search as well as drafting the manuscript. NIL, DLR and ØR critically reviewed and commented the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Regional Department for Eating Disorders, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Oslo, Norway

    Tone Seim Fuglset, Deborah Lynn Reas & Øyvind Rø

  2. Department of Psychology, Clinical Neuroscience Research Group, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

    Nils Inge Landrø

  3. Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

    Deborah Lynn Reas

  4. Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

    Øyvind Rø

Authors
  1. Tone Seim Fuglset
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nils Inge Landrø
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Deborah Lynn Reas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Øyvind Rø
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tone Seim Fuglset.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fuglset, T.S., Landrø, N.I., Reas, D.L. et al. Functional brain alterations in anorexia nervosa: a scoping review. J Eat Disord 4, 32 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-016-0118-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-016-0118-y

Keywords

Journal of Eating Disorders

ISSN: 2050-2974